189 lines
11 KiB
Python
189 lines
11 KiB
Python
|
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||
|
|
# Part of Odoo. See LICENSE file for full copyright and licensing details.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
from datetime import datetime, date
|
||
|
|
from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
from freezegun import freeze_time
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
from odoo import SUPERUSER_ID
|
||
|
|
from odoo.addons.hr_work_entry_holidays.tests.common import TestWorkEntryHolidaysBase
|
||
|
|
from odoo.tests import tagged
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@tagged('test_leave')
|
||
|
|
class TestWorkEntryLeave(TestWorkEntryHolidaysBase):
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_resource_leave_has_work_entry_type(self):
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
resource_leave = leave._create_resource_leave()
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(resource_leave.work_entry_type_id, self.leave_type.work_entry_type_id, "it should have the corresponding work_entry type")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_resource_leave_in_contract_calendar(self):
|
||
|
|
other_calendar = self.env['resource.calendar'].create({'name': 'New calendar'})
|
||
|
|
contract = self.richard_emp.contract_ids[0]
|
||
|
|
contract.resource_calendar_id = other_calendar
|
||
|
|
contract.state = 'open' # this set richard's calendar to New calendar
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
resource_leave = leave._create_resource_leave()
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(resource_leave), 1, "it should have created only one resource leave")
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(resource_leave.work_entry_type_id, self.leave_type.work_entry_type_id, "it should have the corresponding work_entry type")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_create_mark_conflicting_work_entries(self):
|
||
|
|
work_entry = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 10, 12, 0))
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should not be conflicting")
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(date(2019, 10, 10), date(2019, 10, 10))
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should be conflicting")
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.leave_id, leave, "It should be linked to conflicting leave")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_write_mark_conflicting_work_entries(self):
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(date(2019, 10, 10), datetime(2019, 10, 10))
|
||
|
|
work_entry = self.create_work_entry(leave.date_from - relativedelta(days=1), leave.date_from) # the day before
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should not be conflicting")
|
||
|
|
leave.request_date_from = date(2019, 10, 9) # now it conflicts
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should be conflicting")
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.leave_id, leave, "It should be linked to conflicting leave")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_validate_leave_with_overlap(self):
|
||
|
|
contract = self.richard_emp.contract_ids[:1]
|
||
|
|
contract.state = 'open'
|
||
|
|
contract.date_generated_from = datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0)
|
||
|
|
contract.date_generated_to = datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0)
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 12, 18, 0))
|
||
|
|
work_entry_1 = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 8, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 11, 9, 0)) # overlaps
|
||
|
|
work_entry_2 = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 11, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 11, 10, 0)) # included
|
||
|
|
adjacent_work_entry = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 12, 18, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 13, 18, 0)) # after and don't overlap
|
||
|
|
leave.action_validate()
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(adjacent_work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should not conflict")
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(work_entry_2.active, "It should have been archived")
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry_1.state, 'conflict', "It should conflict")
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(work_entry_1.leave_id, "It should not be linked to the leave")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
leave_work_entry = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([('leave_id', '=', leave.id)]) - work_entry_1
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(leave_work_entry.work_entry_type_id.is_leave, "It should have created a leave work entry")
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(leave_work_entry[:1].state, 'conflict', "The leave work entry should conflict")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_conflict_move_work_entry(self):
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 12, 18, 0))
|
||
|
|
work_entry = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 8, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 11, 9, 0)) # overlaps
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should be conflicting")
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.leave_id, leave, "It should be linked to conflicting leave")
|
||
|
|
work_entry.date_stop = datetime(2019, 10, 9, 9, 0) # no longer overlaps
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "It should not be conflicting")
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(work_entry.leave_id, "It should not be linked to any leave")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_validate_leave_without_overlap(self):
|
||
|
|
contract = self.richard_emp.contract_ids[:1]
|
||
|
|
contract.state = 'open'
|
||
|
|
contract.date_generated_from = datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0)
|
||
|
|
contract.date_generated_to = datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0)
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 12, 18, 0))
|
||
|
|
work_entry = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 11, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 11, 10, 0)) # included
|
||
|
|
leave.action_validate()
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(work_entry[:1].active, "It should have been archived")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
leave_work_entry = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([('leave_id', '=', leave.id)])
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(leave_work_entry.work_entry_type_id.is_leave, "It should have created a leave work entry")
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(leave_work_entry[:1].state, 'conflict', "The leave work entry should not conflict")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_refuse_leave(self):
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(date(2019, 10, 10), date(2019, 10, 10))
|
||
|
|
work_entries = self.richard_emp.contract_id._generate_work_entries(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 0, 0, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 10, 23, 59, 59))
|
||
|
|
adjacent_work_entry = self.create_work_entry(leave.date_from - relativedelta(days=3), leave.date_from)
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(all(work_entries.mapped(lambda w: w.state == 'conflict')), "Attendance work entries should all conflict with the leave")
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(adjacent_work_entry.state, 'conflict', "Non overlapping work entry should not conflict")
|
||
|
|
leave.action_refuse()
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(all(work_entries.mapped(lambda w: w.state != 'conflict')), "Attendance work entries should no longer conflict")
|
||
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(adjacent_work_entry.state, 'conflict', "Non overlapping work entry should not conflict")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_refuse_approved_leave(self):
|
||
|
|
start = datetime(2019, 10, 10, 6, 0)
|
||
|
|
end = datetime(2019, 10, 10, 18, 0)
|
||
|
|
# Setup contract generation state
|
||
|
|
contract = self.richard_emp.contract_ids[:1]
|
||
|
|
contract.state = 'open'
|
||
|
|
contract.date_generated_from = start - relativedelta(hours=1)
|
||
|
|
contract.date_generated_to = start - relativedelta(hours=1)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
leave = self.create_leave(start, end)
|
||
|
|
leave.action_validate()
|
||
|
|
work_entries = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([('employee_id', '=', self.richard_emp.id), ('date_start', '<=', end), ('date_stop', '>=', start)])
|
||
|
|
leave_work_entry = self.richard_emp.contract_ids.generate_work_entries(start.date(), end.date())
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(leave_work_entry[:1].leave_id, leave)
|
||
|
|
leave.action_refuse()
|
||
|
|
work_entries = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([('employee_id', '=', self.richard_emp.id), ('date_start', '>=', start), ('date_stop', '<=', end)])
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(leave_work_entry[:1].filtered('leave_id').active)
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(work_entries), 2, "Attendance work entries should have been re-created (morning and afternoon)")
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(all(work_entries.mapped(lambda w: w.state != 'conflict')), "Attendance work entries should not conflict")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_archived_work_entry_conflict(self):
|
||
|
|
self.create_leave(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 10, 18, 0))
|
||
|
|
work_entry = self.create_work_entry(datetime(2019, 10, 10, 9, 0), datetime(2019, 10, 10, 18, 0))
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(work_entry.active)
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.state, 'conflict', "Attendance work entries should conflict with the leave")
|
||
|
|
work_entry.toggle_active()
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(work_entry.state, 'cancelled', "Attendance work entries should be cancelled and not conflict")
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(work_entry.active)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_work_entry_cancel_leave(self):
|
||
|
|
user = self.env['res.users'].create({
|
||
|
|
'name': 'User Employee',
|
||
|
|
'login': 'jul',
|
||
|
|
'password': 'julpassword',
|
||
|
|
})
|
||
|
|
self.richard_emp.user_id = user
|
||
|
|
self.richard_emp.contract_ids.state = 'open'
|
||
|
|
with freeze_time(datetime(2022, 3, 21)):
|
||
|
|
# Tests that cancelling a leave archives the work entries.
|
||
|
|
leave = self.env['hr.leave'].with_user(user).create({
|
||
|
|
'name': 'Sick 1 week during christmas snif',
|
||
|
|
'employee_id': self.richard_emp.id,
|
||
|
|
'holiday_status_id': self.leave_type.id,
|
||
|
|
'request_date_from': date(2022, 3, 22),
|
||
|
|
'request_date_to': date(2022, 3, 25),
|
||
|
|
})
|
||
|
|
leave.with_user(SUPERUSER_ID).action_validate()
|
||
|
|
# No work entries exist yet
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(leave.can_cancel, "The leave should still be cancellable")
|
||
|
|
# can not create in the future
|
||
|
|
self.richard_emp.contract_ids.generate_work_entries(date(2022, 3, 21), date(2022, 3, 25))
|
||
|
|
work_entries = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([('employee_id', '=', self.richard_emp.id)])
|
||
|
|
leave.invalidate_recordset(['can_cancel'])
|
||
|
|
# Work entries exist but are not locked yet
|
||
|
|
self.assertTrue(leave.can_cancel, "The leave should still be cancellable")
|
||
|
|
work_entries.action_validate()
|
||
|
|
leave.invalidate_recordset(['can_cancel'])
|
||
|
|
# Work entries locked
|
||
|
|
self.assertFalse(leave.can_cancel, "The leave should not be cancellable")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_work_entry_generation_company_time_off(self):
|
||
|
|
existing_leaves = self.env['hr.leave'].search([])
|
||
|
|
existing_leaves.action_refuse()
|
||
|
|
existing_leaves.action_draft()
|
||
|
|
existing_leaves.unlink()
|
||
|
|
start = date(2022, 8, 1)
|
||
|
|
end = date(2022, 8, 31)
|
||
|
|
self.contract_cdi.generate_work_entries(start, end)
|
||
|
|
work_entries = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([
|
||
|
|
('employee_id', '=', self.jules_emp.id),
|
||
|
|
('date_start', '>=', start),
|
||
|
|
('date_stop', '<=', end),
|
||
|
|
])
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(work_entries.work_entry_type_id), 1)
|
||
|
|
leave = self.env['hr.leave'].create({
|
||
|
|
'name': 'Holiday!!!',
|
||
|
|
'holiday_type': 'company',
|
||
|
|
'mode_company_id': self.env.company.id,
|
||
|
|
'holiday_status_id': self.leave_type.id,
|
||
|
|
'request_date_from': datetime(2022, 8, 8),
|
||
|
|
'request_date_to': datetime(2022, 8, 8),
|
||
|
|
})
|
||
|
|
leave.action_validate()
|
||
|
|
work_entries = self.env['hr.work.entry'].search([
|
||
|
|
('employee_id', '=', self.jules_emp.id),
|
||
|
|
('date_start', '>=', start),
|
||
|
|
('date_stop', '<=', end),
|
||
|
|
])
|
||
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(work_entries.work_entry_type_id), 2)
|